|
These are all Coast Gartersnakes but because the subspecies is so variable in appearance I have separated the pictures into four sections - three loosely-defined color and pattern types of adults, plus juveniles.
|
Coast Gartersnakes with Light Dorsal and Side Stripes and Black and Red Sides |
|
Adult, Napa County |
|
|
|
|
|
Adult, San Mateo County |
|
Adult, Humboldt County |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Marin County |
Adult, Marin County |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Monterey County |
Adult, Marin County |
Adult, bulging from a recent meal,
Marin County |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Marin County |
Adult, San Mateo County
© Faris K |
Adult, San Mateo County
© Faris K |
|
|
|
|
Adult, San Francisco County
© Luke Talltree |
Adult with only a little red on sides, Sonoma County © Jim Tracy |
Adult, San Francisco County © Zach Lim |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Del Norte County © Alan D. Barron |
Adult, San Francisco County © Zach Lim |
Adult, southern Napa County.
|
|
|
|
|
Adult, San Mateo County
© Yuval Helfman |
Adult, Marin County
© Yuval Helfman |
Two adults from the same location in Marin County with different coloring. |
This picture shows some of the variety of colors and patterns seen in a single population of this snake. All three snakes were all found at the same location in San Mateo County. © John Worden |
|
|
|
|
A Coast Gartersnake (right) basks in dry grass next to a San Francisco Gartersnake (left) that is emerging from a gopher hole in San Mateo County.
© Zach Lim |
This unusually colorful adult gartersnake from Humboldt county appears to be T. elegans by its small eyes and head shape, but I can't be certain of the ID and there is a chance it could be an unusual T. sirtalis or T. ordinoides. |
|
|
|
|
|
Coast Gartersnakes with a Lot of Red on the Side Stripes |
Some of these are sometimes called "high red" or "flame" phase Coast Gartersnakes.
|
|
Adult with mostly red side stripes, San Mateo County © James Maughn |
|
|
|
|
Juvenile, Alameda County (SF Bay shoreline) |
Adult, Marin County (San Rafael) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adult, Monterey County coastal dunes |
|
Wide red-striped adult, Santa Cruz County. © Susannah Goldston |
|
|
|
Adult, Contra Costa County (Berkeley Hills) |
Adult, Contra Costa County
(Berkeley Hills) |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Monterey County coastal dunes |
Adult, Santa Cruz County
© Benjamin German |
Adults, San Mateo County © Faris K |
Red-striped adult, San Mateo County
© Brian Hubbs |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Santa Cruz County © Zach Lim |
Adult, Santa Cruz County
© 2005 Brad Alexander
|
Adult, San Mateo County © Jared Heald |
Adults, San Mateo County
© Jared Heald |
|
|
|
|
This adult from Santa Clara County has red on all three stripes. © Holly Brown |
This high red snake was found near the bay in Monterey County. © Phil Gervato |
|
|
|
|
Adult, San Mateo County © Jared Heald |
Adult, San Mateo County © Jared Heald |
Adult, San Mateo County © Jared Heald |
Adult, San Mateo County © Jared Heald |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Alameda County © Jim Tracy |
Adult and juvenile found in a city park in Lodi, San Joaquin County. © Patrick Briggs
(Somebody most likely transported the adult snake there since that is the range of the Mountain Gartersnake.) |
Adult, San Mateo County
© Luke Talltree |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Humboldt County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coast Garternakes with Little or No Red Coloring |
|
|
|
|
Adult, with no red, San Luis Obispo County |
Adult with little red, Marin County
© Luke Talltree |
Adult, San Luis Obispo County
© Patrick Briggs |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Del Norte County © Alan D. Barron |
Large old adult with little red,
San Mateo County
|
Adult, Marin County (San Rafael) |
|
|
|
|
A dark, bluish adult with only a few red spots from Santa Cruz County.
© James Maughn
|
Adult, Monterey County.
© Van Wishingrad |
Brown phase adult, Santa Clara County, from a location where this phase is very common. © Faris K |
Black phase adult, Santa Clara County, from the same location as the brown phase to the left. © Faris K |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Sonoma County © Jim Tracy |
Grayish adult, Marin County
© Jim Tracy |
Adult puffed up in a defensive pose, with head flattened into a triangular shape, Santa Barbara County
@ Jeff Hopkins. |
Adult, Monterey County.
© Van Wishingrad |
|
|
|
|
Swimming adult, Monterey County.
© Van Wishingrad |
Adult Terrestrial Gartersnake (presumed to be Thamnophis elegans terrestris) Santa Rosa Island © Marlon Harrington |
|
|
|
|
Adult, Humboldt County |
Adult, Humboldt County |
Adult, Sonoma County © Laura Baker
This possibly melanistic snake has only faint remnants of dorsal and lateral stripes. |
|
|
|
|
Juvenile Coast Gartersnakes |
|
|
|
|
Juvenile, Marin County |
Juveniles found under the same board in Alameda
County, with two different color patterns. |
Juvenile, San Mateo County © Zach Lim |
|
|
|
|
Juvenile, Del Norte County © Alan D. Barron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparisons With Sympatric Gartersnakes |
|
|
|
|
Three species of gartersnakes found at the same Marin County location:
Right - Thamnophis atratus
Bottom left - Thamnophis sirtalis
Top - Thamnophis elegans
© Luke Talltree |
Three species of gartersnakes found at the same Marin County location:
Top - Thamnophis sirtalis
Middle - Thamnophis elegans
Bottom - Thamnophis atratus
© Zach Lim |
Two Marin County snakes:
Coast Gartersnake on top;
Aquatic Gartersnake on bottom. |
Two Marin County snakes:
Aquatic Gartersnake on left;
Coast Gartersnake on right.
|
|
|
|
|
Two species of gartersnakes found at the same Marin County location:
Left - Thamnophis atratus
Right - Thamnophis elegans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coast Gartersnakes Feeding |
|
|
|
|
A Coast Gartersnake eating a Spotted Towhee in Santa Cruz County.
The bird looks too big for the snake to swallow, but the final outcome is unknown © Scott Peden |
Adult, San Mateo County, eating a bird,
found by Zach Mumbach,
Photo © Aaron Reif |
|
|
|
|
This adult Coast Gartersnake was observed killing a small rat
in San Mateo County. © Jack Hankin |
Gartersnake eating a Coast Range Fence Lizard in San Luis Obispo County © Joel Germond |
|
|
|
|
Adult gartersnake of undetermined species eating a banana slug in Mendocino County. (It's either a Coast Gartersnake or an Oregon Gartersnake.)
© Gail Jackson |
Adult eating a saltwater fish it found stranded in a tide pool on a rocky beach below the high tide mark in San Luis Obispo County © Randy Pickard |
|
|
Adult eating a rodent in Monterey County © Regan Sikola |
|
|
|
Adult eating a toxic California Newt in San Luis Obispo County © Ryan Sikola
You can read about gartersnakes eating toxic newts below. |
Adult eating a Banana Slug in San Mateo County © Rory Doolin |
|
|
|
|
|
Habitat |
|
|
|
|
Coastal habitat,
Monterey County |
Habitat, San Luis Obispo County |
Coastal pond habitat,
San Mateo County |
Riparian woodland habitat,
Contra Costa County |
|
|
|
|
Coastal riparian habitat, Marin County |
Forest habitat, Humboldt County |
Coastal meadow habitat,
Humboldt County |
Habitat, Alameda County |
|
|
|
|
Coastal pond habitat,
San Mateo County |
Habitat, Santa Cruz County © Colin Byrne |
Coastal habitat, Monterey County |
Habitat, Santa Cruz Mountains
© Zachary Lim |
|
|
|
|
San Francisco County Habitats © Zachary Lim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Video |
|
|
|
|
A couple of snakes from the coast of Marin County, doing what snakes do -
trying to get away from an annoying human with a video camera. They finally did. |
|
|
|
|
Description |
Not Dangerous - This snake may produce a mild venom that does not typically cause death or serious illness or injury in most humans, but its bite should be avoided.
Commonly described as "harmless" or "not poisonous" to indicate that its bite is not dangerous, but "not venomous" is more accurate since the venom is not dangerous. (A poisonous snake can hurt you if you eat it. A venomous snake can hurt you if it bites you.)
Long-considered non-venomous, discoveries in the early 2000s revealed that gartersnakes produce a mild venom that can be harmfull to small prey but is not considered dangerous to most humans, although a bite may cause slight irritation and swelling around the puncture wound. Enlarged teeth at the rear of the mouth are thought to help spread the venom.
|
Size |
Thamnophis elegans measures 18 - 43 inches in length (46 - 109 cm).
|
Appearance |
A medium-sized slender snake with a head barely wider than the neck and keeled dorsal scales. Some scale averages:
Average of 8 upper labial scales, occasionally 7, scales 6 and 7 are enlarged, higher than wide.
Average of 10 lower labial scales.
The front and rear pair of chin shields are equal in length.
The internasals are wider than long and not pointed in front.
Average scale count at mid-body is 21, rarely 19. |
Color and Pattern |
Color and pattern is highly variable, but there is usually a yellow dorsal stripe and a yellowish stripe along the bottom of each side.
The underside is yellowish to bluish-gray with varying amounts of reddish markings. A considerable variation in color and pattern occurs.
One color phase consists of a yellow dorsal stripe and two distinct yellowish or whitish side stripes, with black checkered spots on the sides inbetween the stripes on a reddish ground color, creating a red and black checkerboard appearance.
This phase occurs primarily on the San Francisco peninsula and north along the coast into Marin County and possibly farther.
On some snakes in the Santa Cruz Mountains and the Monterey Bay area, the side stripes are red, with varying degrees of checkering or barring of the black on a reddish ground color.
On some snakes the ground color is almost completely solid dark, the dorsal stripe is yellow, but the side stripes are reddish. We include pictures here of this phase from the East Bay hills, the Santa Cruz Mountains, and southeast Marin County near the S.F. bay.
Another color phase consists of almost completely solid dark coloring between distinct light side and dorsal stripes, with little or no red.
This phase is common on juveniles and seems to be most common on adults from Santa Cruz County south.
Along the far north coast in Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, the dark coloring can be light brown with little red, or there can be a heavy red wash over the sides.
Snakes there can also have three yellowish stripes, a reddish ground color with some black markings, and a dark bar beneath each side of the dorsal stripe.
Stebbins (2003) describes the color variations that occur from the southern S.F. Bay Area and south:
"On San Francisco peninsula 3 yellowish stripes evident and a checkerboard of dark spots occurs between the stripes on a reddish ground color. The dark spots give way to alternating dark and reddish bars on sides in areas along outer coast from cen. San Mateo Co. to near Moss Landing, Monterey Co. this color type also occurs in East Bay Hills. Increase in dark color, with almost solid dark fields between the dorsal and side stripes, occurs in Santa Cruz Mts. and Monterey area, south to southern end of range near Lake Casitas, Ventura Co. Middorsal stripe is pale yellow and side stripes are yellowish. However, salmon or reddish side stripes are found in Santa Cruz Mts. and elsewhere at some localities in San Francisco Bay Area."
|
Key to Identifying California Gartersnake Species
|
Life History and Behavior |
Activity |
Active in daylight.
Chiefly terrestrial - not as dependant on water as other gartersnake species, but more likely to be found near water.
|
Defense |
When frightened, this species will sometimes seek refuge in vegetation or ground cover, but it will also crawl quickly into water and swim away from trouble.
If frightened when picked up, this snake will often strike repeatedly and release cloacal contents and musk. |
Diet and Feeding |
Western Terrestrial Gartersnakes - Thamnophis elegans - eat a wide range of prey (among the widest of any snake species - Rossmann, et al. 1996.) The prey depends on the size of the snake (large snakes tend to eat larger prey, small snakes can only eat smaller prey) and what prey is available. Populations found on the humid North Coast where slugs are abundant are genetically predisposed to eat slugs, while populations in dryer areas where slugs are less common refuse to eat slugs when they are offered. (Rossmann, et al. 1996.)
Diet includes: invertebrates such as slugs, leeches, snails, and earthworms; fish; amphibians - tadpoles, frogs, (and probably salamanders); snakes and lizards; birds; and small mammals such as mice and voles.
Toxic Newts
Thamnophis elegans terrestris has been found eating Taricha torosa, which are deadly poisonous to most predators, in San Luis Obispo County.
(Feldman, Hansen, & Sikola. Herpetological Review 51[3] 2020.)
The Bay Area is the Center of an Evolutionary Race Between Hungry Snakes and Toxic Newts.
by Anton Sorokin. Bay Nature, April 6, 2022
Gartersnakes Can Become Poisonous
There is evidence that when Common Gartersnakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) eat Rough-skinned Newts (Taricha granulosa) they retain the deadly neurotoxin found in the skin of the newts called tetrodotoxin for several weeks, making the snakes poisonous (not venomous) to predators (such as birds or mammals) that eat the snakes. Since California Newts (Taricha torosa) also contain tetrodotoxin in their skin, and since gartersnake species other than T. sirtalis also eat newts, it is not unreasonable to conclude that any gartersnake that eats either species of newt is poisonous to predators.
Williams, Becky L.; Brodie, Edmund D. Jr.; Brodie, Edmund D. III (2004). "A Resistant Predator and Its Toxic Prey: Persistence of Newt Toxin Leads to Poisonous (Not Venomous) Snakes." Journal of Chemical Ecology. 30 (10): 1901–1919.) https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000045585.77875.09
Joseph Grinnell and Charles Lewis Camp. A Distributional List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. University of California Publications in Zoology Vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 127-208. July 11, 1917.
|
Reproduction |
Mates primarily in spring.
Females are ovoviviparous. After mating with a male they carry the eggs internally until the young are born live from July to Sepember.
|
Habitat |
Inhabits mixed woodland, grassland, coniferous forest, dunes, brushland, generally in the vicinity of ponds or flowing water.
|
Geographical Range |
The species Thamnophis elegans - Western Terrestrial Gartersnake, ranges widely from the California coast north through most of northern California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana, into Canada, including Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan, and east into the states of Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico and just barely making it into South Dakota, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. Many isolated populations exist, including those in the San Bernardino Mountains and one in Baja California Norte, Mexico (the San Pedro Martir Gartersnake.)
This subspecies, Thamnophis elegans terrestris - Coast Gartersnake, occurs along the Pacific coast from southern Oregon to Ventura County.
Most range maps showing subspecies of T. elegans, show T. e. elegans occurring in the Central Valley near Lodi. Previously I changed my range map to show a small population of T. e. terrestris there based on pictures of a bright red snake found in Lodi, but discussions with a herpetologist familiar with that area have convinced me that only T. e. elegans is found in the San Joaquin Valley. It's likely that the wild-caught Lodi specimen was transported there by somebody.
A range of intergradation is traditionally shown running the length of the Sierra Nevada mountains, but I am not certain exactly where or how wide it is.
|
|
Elevational Range |
In 2008, Cathryn J. Wise and others showed that the longstanding elevation record of 13,100 ft. (3,990 m) in Colorado for Thamnopis elegans, based on specimens of T. e. vagrans collected in 1960, is questionable, and that a more reliable record for the species is from 12,002 ft. (3658 m) on Humphrey's Peak in Arizona.
(Herpetological Review 39(3), 2008)
|
Notes on Taxonomy |
T. e. vagrans intergrades with T. e. elegans in northeast California in Modoc and eastern Siskiyou counties and in south central Oregon (this snake was formerly classified as the subspecies Thamnophis elegans biscutatus - Klamath Gartersnake. Intergrades with T. e. elegans also occur along the southern and southeastern edge of the Sierras.
Three subspecies of Thamnophis elegans are found in California - T. e. vagrans - Wandering Gartersnake, T. e. e.egans - Mountain Gartersnake, and T. e. terrestris - Coast Gartersnake.
Rossman, Ford, and Seigel (1996) emphasize that a detailed study of geographic variation throughout the range of Thamnophis elegans is badly needed.
Bronikowski and Arnold (2001, Copeia 2001:508-513) found several clades within T. elegans that do not always follow the subspecies boundaries, and concluded that there was no support for the race terrestris. Presumably, the former T. e. terrestris snakes become T. e. elegans.
Hammerson (1999, Amphibians and Reptiles of Colorado. 2nd ed. Univ. of Colorado Press) synonymized T. e. arizonae and T. e. vascotanneri but retained three subspecies, T. e. vagrans, T. e. elegans, and T. e. terrestris.
Alternate and Previous Names (Synonyms)
Thamnophis elegans terrestris - Coast Garter Snake (Stebbins 1966, 1985, 2003, Stebbins & McGinnis 2012) Thamnophis elegans hueyi (Stebbins 1954) Thamnophis elegans terrestris - Coastal California garter snake (Fox 1951)
Thamnophis ordinoides elegans - Elegant Garter Snake (Eutainia elegans; Eutainia vagrans; Eutaenia infernalis, part; Eutaenia elegans lineolata; Eutaenia elegans brunnea; Eutaenia couchii; Thamnopis infernalis, part; Tropidonotus tri-vittatus; Eutaenia elegans couchii, part; Tropidonotus ordinatus infernalis; Tropidonotus ordinatus ver. couchii; Thamnophis vagrans; Thamnophis parietalis, part; Eutaenia elegans vagrans; Eutaenia hammondi, part; Thamnophis elegans, part; Eutaenia elegans infernalis. Boyd's Garter Snake; Pacific Garter Snake; Wandering Garter Snake; Hammond's Garter Snake; Single-striped Garter Snake; Green Garter Snake;, Western Garter Snake) (Grinnell and Camp 1917)
|
Conservation Issues (Conservation Status) |
This species is not known to be threatened, but gartersnakes have been negatively impacted by competition with introduced bullfrogs and non-native fish in some areas. |
|
Taxonomy |
Family |
Colubridae |
Colubrids |
Oppel, 1811 |
Genus |
Thamnophis |
North American Gartersnakes |
Fitzinger, 1843 |
Species |
elegans |
Western Terrestrial Gartersnake |
(Baird and Girard, 1853) |
Subspecies
|
terrestris |
Coast Gartersnake |
Fox, 1951 |
|
Thamnophis elegans - (Baird and Girard, 1853) - Cat. N. Amer. Rept., Pt. 1, p. 34
Thamnophis elegans terrestris - Fox, 1951 - Univ. California Publ. Zool., Vol. 50, p. 499, fig. 3
from Original Description Citations for the Reptiles and Amphibians of North America © Ellin Beltz
|
Meaning of the Scientific Name |
Thamnophis - Greek - thamnos - shrub or bush, and ophis - snake, serpent
elegans - Latin - fine or elegant -- "delicately carinated"
terrestris - Latin - of the earth - probably refers to the hatitat and the terrestrial nature
from Scientific and Common Names of the Reptiles and Amphibians of North America - Explained © Ellin Beltz
|
Other California Gartersnakes |
T. a. atratus - Santa Cruz Gartersnake
T. a. hydrophilus - Oregon Gartersnake
T. a. zaxanthus - Diablo Range Gartersnake
T. couchii - Sierra Gartersnake
T. gigas - Giant Gartersnake
T. e. elegans - Mountain Gartersnake
T. e. vagrans - Wandering Gartersnake
T. hammondii - Two-striped Gartersnake
T. m. marcianus - Marcy's Checkered Gartersnake
T. ordinoides - Northwestern Gartersnake
T. s. fitchi - Valley Gartersnake
T. s. infernalis - California Red-sided Gartersnake
T. s. tetrataenia - San Francisco Gartersnake
|
More Information and References |
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Rossman, Douglas A., Neil B, Ford, & Richard A. Siegel. The Garter Snakes - Evolution and Ecology. University of Oklahoma press, 1996.
Stebbins, Robert C., and McGinnis, Samuel M. Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles of California: Revised Edition (California Natural History Guides) University of California Press, 2012.
Stebbins, Robert C. California Amphibians and Reptiles. The University of California Press, 1972.
Flaxington, William C. Amphibians and Reptiles of California: Field Observations, Distribution, and Natural History. Fieldnotes Press, Anaheim, California, 2021.
Samuel M. McGinnis and Robert C. Stebbins. Peterson Field Guide to Western Reptiles & Amphibians. 4th Edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 2018.
Stebbins, Robert C. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. 3rd Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.
Behler, John L., and F. Wayne King. The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Reptiles and Amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, 1992.
Powell, Robert., Joseph T. Collins, and Errol D. Hooper Jr. A Key to Amphibians and Reptiles of the Continental United States and Canada. The University Press of Kansas, 1998.
Bartlett, R. D. & Patricia P. Bartlett. Guide and Reference to the Snakes of Western North America (North of Mexico) and Hawaii. University Press of Florida, 2009.
Bartlett, R. D. & Alan Tennant. Snakes of North America - Western Region. Gulf Publishing Co., 2000.
Brown, Philip R. A Field Guide to Snakes of California. Gulf Publishing Co., 1997.
Ernst, Carl H., Evelyn M. Ernst, & Robert M. Corker. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, 2003.
Taylor, Emily. California Snakes and How to Find Them. Heyday, Berkeley, California. 2024.
Wright, Albert Hazen & Anna Allen Wright. Handbook of Snakes of the United States and Canada. Cornell University Press, 1957.
|
|
|
The following conservation status listings for this animal are taken from the April 2024 State of California Special Animals List and the April 2024 Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California list (unless indicated otherwise below.) Both lists are produced by multiple agencies every year, and sometimes more than once per year, so the conservation status listing information found below might not be from the most recent lists. To make sure you are seeing the most recent listings, go to this California Department of Fish and Wildlife web page where you can search for and download both lists:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals.
A detailed explanation of the meaning of the status listing symbols can be found at the beginning of the two lists. For quick reference, I have included them on my Special Status Information page.
If no status is listed here, the animal is not included on either list. This most likely indicates that there are no serious conservation concerns for the animal. To find out more about an animal's status you can also go to the NatureServe and IUCN websites to check their rankings.
Check the current California Department of Fish and Wildlife sport fishing regulations to find out if this animal can be legally pursued and handled or collected with possession of a current fishing license. You can also look at the summary of the sport fishing regulations as they apply only to reptiles and amphibians that has been made for this website.
This snake is not included on the Special Animals List, which indicates that there are no significant conservation concerns for it in California.
|
Organization |
Status Listing |
Notes |
NatureServe Global Ranking |
|
|
NatureServe State Ranking |
|
|
U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) |
None |
|
California Endangered Species Act (CESA) |
None |
|
California Department of Fish and Wildlife |
None |
|
Bureau of Land Management |
None |
|
USDA Forest Service |
None |
|
IUCN |
|
|
|
|